Your Hosting Options
    website hosting provider
      

  • Top 10 Best Web Hosting Reviews - SCAMS EXPOSED

    Filed under Tech
    Mar 24
    Tagged as: , ,
    • website hosting provider
      

23 Responses to “Top 10 Best Web Hosting Reviews - SCAMS EXPOSED”

  1. hostbite said on March 24th, 2008 at 10:23 pm

    this is one of the best videos on youtube for me.

  2. Conceptskatemedia said on March 25th, 2008 at 3:05 am

    hahaah u owned them with the affiliate links.

  3. thebribri said on March 27th, 2008 at 5:27 pm

    Very sad and very true! Thank you for posting this video! I’m in the process of trying to find a good website host.

  4. StevieArt said on March 28th, 2008 at 3:26 pm

    Sad but true.
    scammedby takes care of it.

  5. JaimeMigMendoza said on April 1st, 2008 at 2:10 am

    Thanks 4 the video! I’ve went through searching for a good web host but…You are right !

  6. reviewsexposed said on April 3rd, 2008 at 12:06 am

    In the interests of objectivity, I don’t make web hosting recommendations… but after you watch the video, you will have a better idea as to what to look for. Bottom-line: Who would you rather host with? A company that puts 70 cents out of every dollar into marketing? Or a company that puts 70 cents out of every dollar into service and better equipment? :) Marketing grows a business, but superior service keeps clients :)

  7. AVJAM2000 said on April 5th, 2008 at 7:31 pm

    so no suggestions for a reliable web host?

  8. brewcitybroker said on April 7th, 2008 at 1:15 am

    That “reasearch well” is where I need help-How? I don’t know anyone personally that has a web site. Where should I look-anything you can point me to that gives a good unbiased review and/or summary?

  9. sunntzu said on April 10th, 2008 at 3:58 am

    I’ve used lp for about 3 years now, and I must say that I have not had a reason to complain yet. My site has never been down, I’ve never had a problem with various payment methods, my band width is admiral, the panel is solid also. For me, it’s perfect. I have yet to have a problem with any site that I have designed on their servers…so, I dont know, maybe it’s just my luck.

  10. reviewsexposed said on April 11th, 2008 at 4:03 am

    Very sorry to hear about your experience with Dot5. Yikes. Best of luck to you. Would like to learn more about your pod cast. Email me plz.

  11. reviewsexposed said on April 11th, 2008 at 6:42 pm

    Thanks for your comments. Sorry to hear about your experience with Lunar Pages. The best bet for hosting is to research well and avoid the so-called TOP 10 Hosts.

  12. l2xdog said on April 13th, 2008 at 4:55 am

    Arrrgh!
    Dot5 just caused me a great headache by shutting down my site because my podcast had “too much out-bound traffic”–this wasn’t even CLOSE to the 15,000 GB bandwidth they claimed to offer me. What is a good service, folks! …sigh. Okay. I got suckered by those sites, too.

  13. brewcitybroker said on April 14th, 2008 at 9:49 am

    I suspected this. Nice way by the way. Is there any place you can go to get an unbiased review because I am looking for a web host. I used one of these and ended up with Lunar pages and they are god awful.

  14. reviewsexposed said on April 15th, 2008 at 11:35 am

    Hello!?? LOL Go to hosting-reviews-exposed (dot) com and you’ll see that the #1 spot can be bought for $2,000. The #9 spot can be purchased for $600. Visit the site and look at the proof.

    SO yes…. the top 10 spots can be bought!

    Thanks for posting! I appreciate your comments!

  15. gravossupream said on April 16th, 2008 at 6:21 pm

    Use of affiliate links means nothing unless you can prove they are in the top10 only because of the affiliate link.
    Theres nothing wrong with selling banner space on a site. You stil have to prove that its the top 10 / reviews that are $bought.
    All youve done is speculate that these reviewers may be corrupt because they sell banner space or use affiliate links. Theres no proof.
    By your logic, any site that sells banner space, or uses affiliate links, yet also has a top 10 list, is corrupt.

  16. reviewsexposed said on April 17th, 2008 at 5:38 am

    I agree, I tried Office Live. Wasn’t impressed. No You have to use their website builder… and you’re stuck. Support took 24+ hours to get back to me. IF you’re looking for a good host, then try one that offers cPanel Web Hosting. Then Google their name and add the word “sucks”. Generally when people complain about a host, they use that word… and the results can be found on Google easily.

  17. matthames3 said on April 19th, 2008 at 10:40 am

    Thanks for the video man, what web-host do you think is the best cause office-live sucks and i need a new one lol

  18. droneant said on April 21st, 2008 at 12:23 am

    What if Rosie O’Donnell won the Miss America Pageant because she bribed her way to the top. Can you honestly say that would be acceptable results? Cheating is cheating no matter how you want to “spin” it.

  19. reviewsexposed said on April 22nd, 2008 at 7:50 pm

    “”How do we know that the more they pay the better the placement?”" To answer your question, visit this site: (hosting-reviews-exposed (dot) com. The site URL is at the end of the video. The site has copies of emails from one of these so-called ratings sites. If you pay $2,000 you get #1 placement…. $1,000 for #2 placement, etc…. all the way down to the #9 spot for $600.

  20. jsurej said on April 25th, 2008 at 6:35 pm

    How do we know that the more they pay the better the placement? Pointing out aff. links and advertising space does not prove this is how the site owner operates his website. I first posted because I found a site like this and the admin was very helpful in providing info and help when I was new to hosting. I knew he was making money but he was very helpful. I guess some sites might operate like how you are saying. I just don’t think we should throw them all under the bus though.

  21. brunogriffin said on April 28th, 2008 at 6:32 am

    Jsurej, if you don’t get it, I’ll explain. The video shows how hosting company ratings are not based on facts, but instead based on dollars. The more you pay, the better your rating.

  22. reviewsexposed said on May 3rd, 2008 at 9:55 pm

    Thanks for your positive feedback. You’re absolutely correct!

  23. LynnStrauch said on May 6th, 2008 at 1:28 pm

    Thank you for doing this. Most people believe what anyone writes, and if Google lists it, then it must be real. WRONG. Exposed is perfect. Most of these companies on the top 10 are affiliates of each other, and therefore have thousands upon thousands of links. Yes it is true, if you have the money, you can get to the top of anything, even get a president elected, but on Google, you also need thousands of links to get to the top of these indexes.

Leave a Reply

Links

 
Powered by Wordpress
Wordpress theme designed by Herdo Web Design